找回密码
 注册
查看: 4672|回复: 4

用LBM做可压缩的人多不?

[复制链接]
发表于 2009-6-25 17:16:13 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式

马上注册,结交更多好友,享用更多功能,让你轻松玩转社区。

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册

x
用LBM做可压缩的人多不?具体准备做些什么工作?
发表于 2009-6-25 17:54:57 | 显示全部楼层

回复 1# zhangyangbo1180 的帖子

我现在在做可压缩,正在学习木头兄他们课题组的耦合双分布函数模型,算过圆柱和翼型绕流算例,还存在许多问题。
发表于 2009-6-25 17:56:09 | 显示全部楼层


你也看了不少文章了吧,基本上就那么几家,,,呵呵,而且有的大牛不看好这个方向,但钱老师却也开始搞了。
anyway,毕业后,我改行,呵呵。
发表于 2014-9-10 21:27:33 | 显示全部楼层

回复 1# zhangyangbo1180 的帖子

本人是LBM的新人,看了好多文章,说LBM不能算可压缩流动,但是也有不少人在计算压缩流,甚至是激波。请问LBM到底能不能计算可压缩流动呢?谢谢
发表于 2014-9-12 10:56:30 | 显示全部楼层

回复 4# qingfengrumu 的帖子

It depends what you meant by "compressible flows". If it means low-speed flows with variable density, then the answer is YES. However, for high-speed flows with shocks, the answer is NO, for the following reasons:

1) the low-Mach-number intrinsic to the LBE;
2) a finite and very small discrete velocity set.

Even if the LBE can be modified to simulate high-speed flows in some cases, one must ask the following questions:

a) Is the LBE accurate for high-speed flows?
b) is the LBE efficient for high-speed flows?
c) what are the advantages of the LBE over existing methods for high-speed flows?

Based on my experience, the answers to above questions are NEGATIVE. It does not matter how many people who say what; what is important is if these people can articulate their arguments with reasons and solid evidence. I have seen none so far.

-- LSL
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表