找回密码
 注册
楼主: azhuzhuaba

fluent算发动机整机

[复制链接]
 楼主| 发表于 2012-5-22 22:21:46 | 显示全部楼层

回复 15# webmaster 的帖子

谢谢斑竹赐教 不要求算准 如果理论上可以但不知道怎么进行呢
发表于 2012-5-23 02:53:56 | 显示全部楼层
一元模型早就有了。二元通流模型也有了。三元定常模型,也可以算。只是,二元和三元的模型计算的结果,并不比一元算得好。
发表于 2012-5-23 07:06:13 | 显示全部楼层
了解一下NPSS计划。
发表于 2012-5-23 16:30:26 | 显示全部楼层
这。。。需要很高的硬件条件,实现应该是没有问题的,貌似国外有人这样做过,但是这种计算成本与计算结果是否是最优化组合还有待验证。
 楼主| 发表于 2012-5-23 21:08:15 | 显示全部楼层
谢谢 版主和会员同仁的指导 看来资料还是找不到了 这么弄确实也够呛
发表于 2012-5-23 21:13:43 | 显示全部楼层

关于NPSS

The Numerical Propulsion System Simulation (NPSS) is a full propulsion system simulation tool used by aerospace engineers to predict and analyze the aerothermodynamic behavior of commercial jet aircraft, military applications, and space transportation. The NPSS framework was developed to support aerospace, but other applications are already leveraging the initial capabilities, such as aviation safety, ground-based power, and alternative energy conversion devices such as fuel cells. By using the framework and developing the necessary components, future applications that NPSS could support include nuclear power, water treatment, biomedicine, chemical processing, and marine propulsion. NPSS will dramatically reduce the time, effort, and expense necessary to design and test jet engines. It accomplishes that by generating sophisticated computer simulations of an aerospace object or system, thus enabling engineers to "test" various design options without having to conduct costly, time-consuming real-life tests. The ultimate goal of NPSS is to create a numerical "test cell" that enables engineers to create complete engine simulations overnight on cost-effective computing platforms. Using NPSS, engine designers will be able to analyze different parts of the engine simultaneously, perform different types of analysis simultaneously (e.g., aerodynamic and structural), and perform analysis in a more efficient and less costly manner.

NPSS will cut the development time of a new engine in half, from 10 years to 5 years. And NPSS will have a similar effect on the cost of development: new jet engines will cost about a billion dollars to develop rather than two billion. NPSS is also being applied to the development of space transportation technologies, and it is expected that similar efficiencies and cost savings will result.

Advancements of NPSS in fiscal year 2001 included enhancing the NPSS Developer's Kit to easily integrate external components of varying fidelities, providing the initial Visual-Based Syntax (VBS) capability, and developing additional capabilities to support space transportation. NPSS was supported under NASA's High Performance Computing and Communications Program.

Through the NASA/Industry Cooperative Effort agreement, NASA Glenn and its industry and Government partners are developing NPSS. The NPSS team consists of propulsion experts and software engineers from GE Aircraft Engines, Pratt & Whitney, The Boeing Company, Honeywell, Rolls-Royce Corporation, Williams International, Teledyne Continental Motors, Arnold Engineering Development Center, Wright Patterson Air Force Base, and the NASA Glenn Research Center.

Glenn is leading the way in developing NPSS--a method for solving complex design problems that's faster, better, and cheaper.
Bibliography

Follen, G.J.: An Object Oriented Extensible Architecture for Affordable Aerospace Propulsion Systems. To be presented in Paris, France, Spring 2002.

Follen, G.; and auBuchon, M.: Numerical Zooming Between the NPSS Version 1 and a One-Dimensional Meanline Design Analysis Code. ISABE Paper 99-7196, 1999.

Binder, M.: Numerical Propulsion System Simulation Introduction. Multimedia CD, mbinder@reality-alt.com, Washington DC, 2001.

Evans, A.L., et al.: Numerical Propulsion System Simulation's National Cycle Program. AIAA Paper 98-3113, 1998.

Ashleman, Russell H., Jr.; Lavelle, Thomas; and Parsons, Frank: The National Cycle Program: A Flexible System Modeling Architecture. AIAA Paper 98-3114, 1998.

Glenn contacts: Cynthia G. Naiman, 216-433-5238, Cynthia.G.Naiman@grc.nasa.gov; and Gregory J. Follen, 216-433-5193, Gregory.J.Follen@grc.nasa.gov
Authors: Laurel J. Stauber and Cynthia G. Naiman
Headquarters program office: OAT
Programs/Projects: HPCCP, CAS
Special recognition: In 2001, the NPSS team won the 2001 NASA Office of Aerospace Technology (OAT) Turning Goals into Reality (TGIR) Award for Goal 3 Pioneering Technology Innovation, was co-winner of the NASA 2001 Software of the Year Award (SOYA), and was a finalist to CrossTalk: The Journal of Defense Software Engineering TOP 5 Software Projects for 2001. NPSS Version 1.0 was selected as one of the top 16 Government Software Projects for 2001 out of 87 nominees.
发表于 2012-5-23 21:23:30 | 显示全部楼层
NPSS实际上是一个发动机开发的软件环境。公布的NPSS提供了数据接口,以及优化工具。跟发动机有关的可能就是一个热力循环分析(零元模型)。其它的,从一元,到三元非定常的工具,都需要用户自己放进去。
NPSS开始是不能出口了。后来开始说要取消限制。不知最后的结果是什么。
发表于 2012-5-24 15:23:01 | 显示全部楼层
觉得燃烧计算很麻烦~~内燃机燃烧就更麻烦了~
发表于 2012-5-24 15:54:36 | 显示全部楼层

回复 21# 通流 的帖子

通流版主教人变懒。
发表于 2012-5-24 20:00:04 | 显示全部楼层
不好意思,英文的只是NASA的宣传材料。后面的中文的更确切。我是怕初学者被老美忽悠了。
 楼主| 发表于 2012-5-25 10:36:39 | 显示全部楼层

回复 25# 通流 的帖子

嗯 取其精华 毕竟落后太多了
发表于 2012-5-25 12:09:07 | 显示全部楼层

回复 25# 通流 的帖子

我的意思是给个关键词,顶多给个链接就行了,让大家自己去搜,不用把原文贴上来,让大家吃现成的。
发表于 2012-5-25 20:12:36 | 显示全部楼层

回复 26# azhuzhuaba 的帖子

是落后。
不过我们知道到底落后在哪里呢?原因是什么呢?
50年代,我们当时生产的发动机并不落后?怎么后来就落后了呢?
现在,我们所谓的引进技术,是不是还是在走50年代的老路?
 楼主| 发表于 2012-5-26 20:37:53 | 显示全部楼层

回复 28# 通流 的帖子

决策者不坚决 社会浮躁功利 没毛爷爷那时候那股劲
现在意识到了 拿起来再搞 不过不容易哈 咱的商用发动机真的不靠谱 不知道能不能出来 什么时候出来
 楼主| 发表于 2012-5-26 20:44:49 | 显示全部楼层

回复 27# xrs333 的帖子

更说明通流版主对我们初学者的谆谆教导撒 哈哈
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表